<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vreugdenhil Research &#187; exploit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vreugdenhilresearch.nl/tags/exploit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vreugdenhilresearch.nl</link>
	<description>Research, Vulnerabilities and Exploits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 14:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Old bugs: YaBB</title>
		<link>http://vreugdenhilresearch.nl/2010/02/old-bugs-yabb/</link>
		<comments>http://vreugdenhilresearch.nl/2010/02/old-bugs-yabb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vreugdenhilresearch.nl/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I decided to write up on some old and funny bugs I found a while back. Starting today with &#8216;remote&#8217; code execution in YaBB version 2.2 the problem is fixed in 2.4 (or so it seems at first glance)
YaBB (yet another bulletin board) is as the name says a bulletin board. Its written in perl [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vreugdenhilresearch.nl/2010/02/old-bugs-yabb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICQ Exploit CVE-2006-5650</title>
		<link>http://vreugdenhilresearch.nl/2009/07/icq-exploit-cve-2006-5650/</link>
		<comments>http://vreugdenhilresearch.nl/2009/07/icq-exploit-cve-2006-5650/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ActiveX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVE-2006-5650]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vreugdenhilresearch.nl/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'll kick off with imho one of my more interresting findings. Its not interresting due to the nature of the vulnerability, but due to the possible impact. It was quite some time ago already, back in the summer of 2006 when I was looking into COM objects that came installed with ICQ. If you're unfamiliair with COM objects and how that 'sneak' in with program installations, I suggest you read this article. Anyway, installing ICQ added a few COM objects that were accesible as ActiveX Objects in IE6 without warning. Most of them were a bit boring, but there was a nice design error in one of them]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vreugdenhilresearch.nl/2009/07/icq-exploit-cve-2006-5650/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
